Which of the following is NOT something the officer and enlisted evaluation systems should establish?

• A. Potential levels and skill abilities among ratees
• B. Evaluation criteria
• C. Responsibilities of raters
• D. Timelines for evaluations

Answer: (A)

These evaluation systems are meant to standardize how performance is measured, who does the rating, and when the evaluations happen. Clear evaluation criteria ensure everyone is judged against the same standards, so ratings reflect actual performance rather than impressions. Outlining the responsibilities of raters creates accountability and guidance for observing, documenting, and justifying ratings, helping to keep the process fair and defensible. Setting timelines for evaluations guarantees timely feedback and compliance with policy, which supports development and career progression.

What isn’t part of the system is establishing potential levels and skill abilities for ratees. The evaluation focuses on current performance and outcomes within the reporting period, not on projecting an individual’s future capacity or assigning fixed potential. Potential and development considerations are handled through separate processes and programs.