Which of the following is NOT what supervisors should do before making a recommendation to unit commanders and civilian directors concerning the Airman's career potential?

• A. Assess past performance
• B. Identify development opportunities
• C. Document potential risks
• D. Review Airman's financial reports

Answer: (A)

Evaluating an Airman's career potential centers on factors that reflect job performance and growth potential. Supervisors should look at how the airman has performed in the past, identify opportunities for development, and document any potential risks that could affect future advancement. These elements are directly linked to whether the airman is ready for greater responsibility and new roles, and they provide a fair basis for recommendations to unit commanders and civilian directors. Reviewing personal financial reports, while important for other reasons, does not indicate professional potential and raises privacy concerns; it isn’t relevant to assessing future performance or leadership capability. By concentrating on past performance, development opportunities, and potential risks, the supervisor presents a focused, appropriate assessment of career potential. The financial information item does not belong in this context, so it’s not something that should be included in the recommendation discussion.